. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2021 Nov 29;131(1):34–44. doi: 10.1037/abn0000717

Table 3A.

Preference and Valuation Consistency Sample 1.

Parameter	Median	89% CI	pd	≈ 2-sided p
β HL SA+MDD	2.670^***	[2.458, 2.871]	1.000	0
β Controls (vs. HL SA+MDD)	1.842^***	[1.415, 2.250]	1.000	0
β MDD (vs. HL SA+MDD)	1.881^***	[1.474, 2.303]	1.000	0
β SI+MDD (vs. HL SA+MDD)	1.247^***	[0.892, 1.605]	1.000	0
β LL SA+MDD (vs. HL SA+MDD)	1.125^***	[0.755, 1.517]	1.000	0
k^subject Controls	0.015	[−0, 172, 0.213]	0.551	0.898
k^subject MDD	0.211	[0.021, 0.397]	0.968	0.064
k^subject SI+MDD	0.177	[−0.036, 0.385]	0.910	0.18
k^subject LL SA+MDD	0.336^*	[0.099, 0.558]	0.991	0.018

Note: k^subject: subject-level discount rate (calculated as −group intercept/group β); β: valuation consistency.

p<.05

^**

p<0.01

^***

p<0.001 (two-sided p-value of respectively .05, .01 and .001 corresponds approximately to a pd of 97.5%, 99.5% and 99.95%). Dependent variable: Choice (now versus later). MDD = major depressive disorder. SI = suicidal ideation. SA = suicide attempt. LL = low lethality. HL = high lethality.