. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2021 Nov 29;131(1):34–44. doi: 10.1037/abn0000717

Table 3C.

Preference and Valuation Consistency Sample 3.

Parameter	Median	89% CI	pd	≈ 2-sided p
β HL SA+MDD	3.764^***	[3.202, 4.365]	1.000	0
β Controls (vs. HL SA+MDD)	1.400^***	[0.756, 1.943]	1.000	0
β MDD (vs. HL SA+MDD)	1.497^***	[0.867, 2.061]	1.000	0
β LL SA+MDD (vs. HL SA+MDD)	1.586^***	[0.922, 2.293]	1.000	0
β Site Code	−0.805^**	[−1.272, −0.331]	0.997	0.006
k^subject Controls	−0.156	[−0.414, 0.105]	0.828	0.344
k^subject MDD	−0.161	[−0.398, 0.106]	0.836	0.328
k^subject LL SA+MDD	−0.012	[−0.267, 0.266]	0.529	0.942

Note: k^subject: subject-level discount rate (calculated as −group intercept/group β); β: valuation consistency.

p<.05

^**

p<0.01

^***

p<0.001 (two-sided p-value of respectively .05, .01 and .001 corresponds approximately to a pd of 97.5%, 99.5% and 99.95%). Dependent variable: Choice (now versus later). MDD = major depressive disorder. SI = suicidal ideation. SA = suicide attempt. LL = low lethality. HL = high lethality.