Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 13;34(3):444–451. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000655

Table 1.

Telemedicine versus in-person considerations

Factors Influencing Appropriateness for Telehealth Encounter
Telehealth specialty setting, place of service • Outpatient—primary care, endocrine, cardiology, neurology, gastroenterology, orthopedic, urology, geriatrics, pediatrics, nephrology, pulmonology/sleep, pain management, rural care, urgent care, school, military
• Emergency department (ED), prehospital emergency medical services
• Nursing home/skilled nursing facility
• Remote patient monitoring at home
• Hospital, critical care unit
• Behavioral health
• Teaching/education (Shaheen et al., 2020; NCTRC, 2021)
Patient setting Remote
• Patient at home and provider at another location
Originating
• Patient at clinic/site with telepresenter (i.e., patient at a clinic or hospital with medical assistant or nurse and is assisting provider at another location with the appointment (Shaheen et al., 2020; NCTRC, 2021)
Provider factors Regulations
• License and certification
• Confidentiality/HIPAA
• Informed consent
• Business associate agreement(s)
• Understand telehealth legislation and reimbursement policies prepandemic, pandemic changes, and postpandemic
• Telemedicine practices and documentation, dedicated telehealth space
Education & experience
• Telehealth didactic and/or hands-on training
• Comfort level with technology
• Telepresence competency
• Triage ability
• Ability to perform and interpret a virtual physical examination based on complaint type
• Ability to select most appropriate telehealth modality based on presenting complaint
• Ability to accommodate patients who are hard of hearing or have decreased vision
Technology
• Equipment, computer, software/applications
• Electronic health record
• Functioning camera, microphone
• Internet, Wi-Fi, and/or cellular connection (Shaheen et al., 2020; Bashshur et al., 2020; Loeb et al., 2020)
Patient factors • Acuity and severity of illness: nonurgent, low risk
• Age
• Gender/condition based
• Preference for telemedicine
• Level of comfort and familiarity with technology
• Social/health disparities—“digital divide”
 o Access to internet or Wi-Fi
 o Access to functioning technology (smartphone or computer with camera and microphone)
 o Insurance type
 o Number of comorbidities
 o Ability to describe symptoms and severity
• Complaint
 o Acute, common complaint
(Shaheen et al., 2020; AMA, 2018; Bashshur et al., 2020; CDC, 2020; Kichloo et al., 2020; Loeb et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2021)
Category/encounter type Provider–patient encounter
• New patient—criteria for establishing a provider–patient relationship
• Established patient
• Specialist consult
• Scheduled appointment
• Unscheduled appointment
• Follow-up
Provider–provider encounter
• Consultation (AMA, 2018)
Appointment type & modality for patients requesting telehealth Acute appointment*—Triage required to assess patient acuity and appointment type should be matched with most appropriate telehealth modality or determine need for escalation
• Audio and video encounter with digital medical kit (i.e., electronic stethoscope, electronic otoscope)
• Audio and video encounter without digital medical kit
• Audio only: no access to observational assessment
Chronic care appointment or follow-up*—Triage required to match patient acuity with telehealth modality or determine need for escalation
• Audio and video encounter with digital medical kit (i.e., electronic stethoscope, electronic otoscope)
• Audio and video encounter without digital medical kit
• Audio only: no access to observational assessment
In-person
• Triage tool and criteria needed to determine in-person vs. virtual encounter
• Consider resources needed to address patient complaint
Higher level of care criteria
• Triage tool needed to assess need for escalation of care
Consult (specialist, radiologist)
• Synchronous audio and video
• Asynchronous
• Audio-only (Kichloo et al., 2020; NCTRC, 2021)
Patient acuity, severity, & resources Triage method
• Chatbot
• Audio-only triage line
• Synchronous audio and video consultation
• Telehealth triage tool for safer telehealth
• Electronic health record tool
Severity of illness
• Physical and psychological status of patient
Resources
• Number and type of resources necessary to address the patient complaint virtually versus in-person
 o Laboratory and diagnostic studies
 o Parenteral medication
 o Special procedure
 o Specialist consult (Brennan & Daly, 2009; Kichloo et al., 2020)
Telehealth utilization • Telehealth as triage tool to determine appropriateness for telehealth, in-person, or escalation of care
• Low-risk urgent care
• Telemedicine to diagnose and treat a complaint/condition
• Telemedicine as a follow-up—posthospital discharge, check-in
• Telemedicine for specialty consultation (CDC, 2020; Kichloo et al., 2020; Portnoy et al., 2020; Sikka et al., 2020)
Physical examination Audio and video
• With digital medical kit
• Observational assessment—no digital medical kit
Audio only
• No observational assessment or physical examination—requires a triage method for appropriateness of audio-only within scope of state and federal legislation (Kichloo et al., 2020)
Escalation or follow-up Escalation
• Improper functioning technology
• High patient acuity
• Number of resources required to treat patient
Follow-up appointment
• In-person, telehealth, or hospital discharge
• Assessment of response to treatment plan and/or prescribed medication
• Post-telemedicine virtual check-in (Sikka et al., 2020)

Consider synchronous audio/video for an unscheduled telehealth appointment.