Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;13:832529. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.832529

TABLE 1.

Summary of potency and efficacy values for sweet taste receptor agonists used in this study. Agonist Emax values were compared to that of sucralose in the same assay and analyzed by an unpaired, two-tailed t-test (α = .05).

Sweetener Activity in DMR assay Activity in FLIPR assay
EC50 (μM) pEC50 SD N Emax SD N EC50 (μM) pEC50 SD N Emax SD N
S819 0.7 6.196 0.114 4 143* 9 4 0.07 7.128 0.041 3 181**** 6 3
S679 1.3 5.914 0.147 7 133 12 3 0.7 6.145 0.115 4 159**** 20 4
S1313 1.5 5.822 0.120 7 130 8 3 0.7 6.177 0.159 4 170**** 22 4
S5227 2.2 5.685 0.184 4 128 9 4 0.3 6.475 0.059 3 177**** 8 3
P-4000 3.8 5.423 0.097 7 102 7 3 2.2 5.674 0.144 3 164**** 20 3
SC-45647 4.3 5.388 0.146 10 97** 18 6 2.3 5.642 0.095 4 98** 4 4
Neotame 7.7 5.137 0.156 4 99* 7 4 1.6 5.815 0.077 4 116**** 6 4
Superaspartame 9.8 5.023 0.128 4 109 8 4 4.7 5.335 0.053 4 105 1 4
Dulcin 33 4.513 0.166 9 57**** 7 9 23 4.637 0.061 4 87**** 5 4
Alitame 37 4.488 0.231 4 106 27 4 20 4.713 0.054 4 100 4 4
rebaudioside A 57 4.293 0.238 7 103 26 3 29 4.538 0.066 4 106 6 4
Stevioside 127 3.943 0.212 7 141 60 3 51 4.300 0.079 4 102 5 4
Sucralose 163 3.825 0.174 22 122 19 22 72 4.159 0.115 22 104 4 22
Saccharin 411 3.482 0.402 6 145 47 3 241 3.743 0.351 4 90**** 5 4
Aspartame 910 3.113 0.246 6 143 17 3 354 3.453 0.043 4 106 6 4
acesulfame K 1,221 3.043 0.352 6 122 78 3 253 3.601 0.069 4 73**** 7 4

****p < .0001, **p < .01, *p < .05.