Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;52(12):14246–14280. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03344-3

Table 15.

Advantages and limitations of the latent variable models employed for mechanical fault detection and fault prognosis

Publication Advantages Limitations
[47] Algorithm: suitable to handle data generated from multimodal distributions. Algorithm: assumes the data was generated from a mixture of finite Gaussian distributions.
[65] Proposed approach: real-time analytics; scalable distributed implementation. Not identified
[54] Algorithm: cluster centers can adapt to new data; capable of classifying data despite noise and outliers. Not identified
Proposed approach: capable of gaining a deep understanding about the equipment’s performance.
[64] Algorithm: interpretability; suitable for small sample size and high-dimensional data. Not identified
Proposed approach: Produces stable and consistent results.
[60] Algorithm: high computational efficiency; greater adaptability; robust to noise; uncovers patterns in raw time series data. Not identified
Proposed approach: superior periodic impulse extraction.
[62] Algorithm: can handle raw multi-dimensional time series; solves the problem of empty cluster creation. Algorithm: the time-series must be synchronous