Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;13(2):71–100. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.71

Table 2.

Systemic hormonal treatments in breast cancer survivors: summary of studies and their outcomes

Ref.
Yr
n 1
Design
Treatment
Conclusion
Holmberg et al[147,149] 2004 2008 221 vs 221 Randomized, non-placebo-controlled noninferiority trial Oral estradiol hemihydrate and Norethisterone (cyclic or continuous) vs control In BCSs, an increased risk of new breast cancer events and adverse events were observed after 2 yr of therapy (HR = 2.4)
von Schoultz et al[150] 2005 188 vs 190 Randomized, non-placebo-controlled noninferiority trial 2 mg estradiol for 21 d with addition of 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for last 10 d; or 2 mg estradiol for 84 d with 20 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for last 10 d; or 2 mg estradiol valerate daily No increased risk of breast cancer recurrence; trial was closed early. So, HT doses of estrogen and progestogen and treatment regimens for menopausal hormone therapy may be associated with the recurrence of breast cancer
Kenemans et al[153] 2009 1556 vs 1542 Prospective randomized placebo controlled Tibolone 2.5 mg daily or placebo Trial was closed early. Tibolone had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer recurrence
Cai et al[168] 2020 1728 vs 3456 Retrospective matched cohort study Incidence rate in ospemifene users vs untreated patients No differences were observed in the BC incidence and recurrence rates in ospemifene users compared with matched controls
1

Cases vs control. BC: Breast cancer, BCSs: Breast cancer survivors.