Table 4.
Logistic regression models for factors associated with L-EBF.
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sociodemographic characteristics | Global model | |||
OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |
Household food security | ||||
Secure | 1 | 0.03 | ||
Marginally insecure | 2.08 (0.88 - 4.96) |
0.09 | ||
Moderately insecure | 2.45 (0.82 - 7.30) |
0.10 | ||
Severely insecure | 9.93 (2.09 - 47.26) |
0.01 | ||
Lived with the baby's father (yes) | 4.93 (1.58, 15.37) |
<0.01 | 3.83 (1.09, 13.37) |
0.03 |
GDM or HDP (yes) | 6.32 (1.41, 28.27) |
0.02 | ||
No previous BF experience or EBF <1 mo | 0.35 (0.12, 1.02) |
0.05 | ||
Maternal BMI at the time of study | 0.91 (0.84, 0.98) |
0.02 | ||
Received other liquid in the hospital (yes) | 0.32 (0.11, 0.92) |
0.03 | ||
Vaginal delivery | 3.21 (1.03, 9.93) |
0.04 | ||
Attended health center at least three times postpartum (yes) | 3.24 (1.06, 9.89) |
0.04 | ||
Had pain or discomfort in breasts/nipples after hospital discharge (yes) | 0.31 (0.12, 0.80) |
0.01 | ||
Limits the duration of the feed (yes) | 0.37 (0.13, 1.01) |
0.05 | ||
Pacifier use after hospital discharge | 0.31 (0.10, 0.94) |
0.04 | ||
“When the baby is not full, you should give her/him powdered milk or some other food, even if she/he is <6 months old” (agree) | 0.22 (0.0.08, 0.55) |
<0.01 |
Model 1. Sociodemographic characteristics: variables not included in the model: occupation (stay-at-home mother or work away from home).
Model 2. Global model variables not included in the final model: household food security, occupation, gestational age and baby had difficulty breastfeeding.
In both models, the predicted probability is for being in the L-EBF group.
Bold values indicate statistically significant differences (p <0.05) between study groups.