Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 18;9:778027. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.778027

Table 1.

Description of studies included in meta-analysis.

References Type of study n Population considered for meta-analysis Abnormal GLS-positive Cut-off of GLS Mean or median of follow-up Withdrawal rate
Kitano et al. (12) Retrospective, monocentric, consecutive pts 325* asy-AS 162 (49.8%) 15.1 24 months 4.41%
Thellier et al. (13) Retrospective, monocentric, consecutive pts 332 severe asy-AS, EF ≥ 50% 192 (57.8%) 15 42 months 0%
Gu et al. (14) Retrospective, monocentric, consecutive pts 218 moderate to severe asy-AS, EF ≥ 50% 131 (60.1%) 15 33.4 months 0%
Carstensen et al. (15) Prospective, multicentric 104 moderate to severe asy-AS, EF ≥ 50% 39 (37.5%) 15 2.3 yrs 0%
Nagata et al. (16) Retrospective, multicentric 104 severe asy-AS, EF > 50% 64 (62.7%) 17 373 days 1.92%
Yingchoncharogen et al. (17) Prospective, monocentric 79 severe asy-AS, EF ≥ 50% NA NA 16 months 0%
Kearney et al. (18) Prospective, monocentric, consecutive pts 135* mild to moderate asy-AS 54 (40.0%) 15 2.1 yrs 7.53%
Zito et al. (19) Prospective, monocentric 52 severe asy-AS, EF ≥ 50% NA NA 11 months 16.92%
Lancellotti et al. (20) Prospective, multicentric 163 moderate to severe asy-AS, EF ≥ 55% 79 (48.5%) 15.9 20 months 0%

Values are expressed as n (%). Asy-AS, asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis; EF, ejection fraction; GLS, global longitudinal strain; NA, not applicable.

*

The population considered for this meta-analysis is a part of the total population of the original study.