Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;12:3519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07475-y

Table 2.

Comparison of maximum adsorption capacities for heavy metals on some adsorbents.

Biomass/waste name Activated agent Created as adsorbent Adsorbate Max.adsorption capacity (mg g−1) References
Green waste tea residue No any activating agent Without activation Cu2+ and Ni2+ 15.6 and 15.9 Present work
Sewage sludge ZnCl2 Activated Cu, Zn, and Al 15.58, 24.09 and 27.70 68

Bamboo

SM1

SM2

No any activating agent Activated Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II)

0.4, 0.17 and 0.40

0.4, 0.25 and 0.39

69
Pistachio shell Fe3O4 NPs@AC@SO3H Activated Pb(II), As(III) and Cd(III) 147.05, 151.51 and 119.04 70
Sugarcane ZnCl2 activated Cu2+, Ni2+ and Pb2+ 2.99, 13.24 and 19.3 71
Coconut shell H3PO4 Activated Cd(II) 33.71 72
Vegetable wastes H2SO4, H3PO4 and NH4NO3 Activated Cd2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ 4.97, 3.29 and 3.07 73
Sand α-Fe2O3 Coated Cu(II) 3.93 35
Sugarcane Bagasse H3PO4 Activated Hg 107.7 74