Table 2.
Comparison of maximum adsorption capacities for heavy metals on some adsorbents.
| Biomass/waste name | Activated agent | Created as adsorbent | Adsorbate | Max.adsorption capacity (mg g−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green waste tea residue | No any activating agent | Without activation | Cu2+ and Ni2+ | 15.6 and 15.9 | Present work |
| Sewage sludge | ZnCl2 | Activated | Cu, Zn, and Al | 15.58, 24.09 and 27.70 | 68 |
|
Bamboo SM1 SM2 |
No any activating agent | Activated | Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) |
0.4, 0.17 and 0.40 0.4, 0.25 and 0.39 |
69 |
| Pistachio shell | Fe3O4 NPs@AC@SO3H | Activated | Pb(II), As(III) and Cd(III) | 147.05, 151.51 and 119.04 | 70 |
| Sugarcane | ZnCl2 | activated | Cu2+, Ni2+ and Pb2+ | 2.99, 13.24 and 19.3 | 71 |
| Coconut shell | H3PO4 | Activated | Cd(II) | 33.71 | 72 |
| Vegetable wastes | H2SO4, H3PO4 and NH4NO3 | Activated | Cd2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ | 4.97, 3.29 and 3.07 | 73 |
| Sand | α-Fe2O3 | Coated | Cu(II) | 3.93 | 35 |
| Sugarcane Bagasse | H3PO4 | Activated | Hg | 107.7 | 74 |