Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;26:101356. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101356

Table 1.

Characteristics of the papers included in the review.

Authors Year Peer reviewed? Location of study Transport Mode Data Collected Sample Size Factors Investigated
Detecting Contamination by SARS-CoV-2ro
1 Abrahão et al. 2021 Yes Brazil bus stations Yes 64 samples (bus) Measuring viral contamination on distinct material surfaces
2 Brazell et al. 2021 pre-print USA bus and light rail Yes 167 samples (in PT) Measuring viral contamination on bus and light rail high-touch points
3 Di Carlo et al. 2020 pre-print Italy bus Yes 104 Measuring viral contamination on a bus
4 Hadei et al. 2021 Yes Iran subway trains and bus Yes 10 samples (in PT) Measuring viral contamination of air samples in public places
5 Lednicky et al. 2021 pre-print USA car Yes NA Testing for air contamination in a car
6 Moreno et al. 2021 Yes Spain subway trains and bus Yes 58 surface samples
24 air samples
Measuring viral contamination on surfaces and in air
7 Passos et al. 2021 Yes Brazil bus stations Yes 5 samples (bus stations) Measuring viral contamination in air
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2
8 Dai & Zhao 2020 pre-print China bus modelling NA Modelling transmission risk on bus with and without mask
9 Hu et al. 2020 Yes China train Yes 2334 index patients Measuring spatial distance, co-travel time
72093 contacts
10 Krishnamurthy et al. 2020 Yes India bus and train modelling NA Modelling number of passengers and exposure time
11 Luo et al. 2020 Yes China coach and minibus yes 1 index patient Seating, duration, ventilation
243 contacts
12 Mesgarpour et al. 2021 Yes Thailand bus modelling NA Modelling droplet spread
13 Mo et al. 2021 Yes Singapore bus modelling NA Modelling effects of operational mitigations on viral spread in network
14 RSSB 2020 yes (by CSA's team at DfT) UK train modelling NA Risk for person-to-person contact, number of person contacts, mitigation factors
15 Shen J et al. 2021 pre-print USA all public transport modelling NA Modelling probability of infection, and estimating effectiveness of IAQ strategies
16 Shen Y et al. 2020 yes China bus yes 1 index patient Modelling high risk vs low risk zones on bus
172 contacts
17 Shoghri et al. 2020 Conference publication Australia bus modelling NA Modelling movements, distance travelled, and number of encounters
Control of SARS-CoV-2
18 Bonful et al. 2020 yes Ghana taxi and bus yes 45 stations Observational study of compliance with guidelines
19 Defar et al. 2020 yes Ethiopia public transport drivers yes 6007 Measuring knowledge, and practices that control COVID-19
20 Dzisi & Dei 2020 yes Ghana bus yes 859 face masks observations
909 distancing observations
Observational study of compliance with guidelines
21 Edwards et al. 2021 pre-print USA bus yes NA Characterising cough aerosol dispersion, operational controls, masks
22 Heald et al. 2020 yes UK all public transport modelling NA Modelling the effect of face masks on transmission
23 Mathai et al. 2020 pre-print USA taxi modelling NA Modelling spread of pathogens within a car with air flow from windows
24 Mitze et al. 2020 no Germany all public transport yes with modelling NA Measuring the effect of compulsory face masks on infection rates
25 Natnael et al. 2021 yes Ethiopia taxi yes 417 drivers Measuring facemask wearing and associated factors
26 Pavansai et al. 2021 Conference publication India bus modelling NA Modelling droplet dispersion with vehicle velocity and cough velocity
27 Talekar et al. 2020 pre-print India train modelling NA Modelling the effects of cohorting workers
28 Zhang et al. 2021 yes USA bus yes NA Measuring droplet spread, ventilation, masks

CSA chief scientific advisor; DfT Department for Transport; IAQ indoor air quality; PT public transport; RSSB Rail Safety and Standards Board.