Table 2. Efficacy Results in the PPS Population.
Group | HD201 | Referent trastuzumab | Difference, % (95% CI)a | Ratio (95% CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted | Adjustedb | Unadjusted | Adjustedb | |||
PPS, No. | 238 | 236 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Locally assessed tpCR | ||||||
Responders, No. (%) [95% CI] | 107 (45.0) [38.5 to 51.5] | 115 (48.7) [42.2 to 55.3] | −3.8 (−12.8 to 5.4) | −2.1 (−10.9 to 6.7) | 0.92 (0.76 to 1.12) | 0.90 (0.75 to 1.07) |
Centrally assessed tpCR | ||||||
Responders, No. (%) [95% CI] | 102 (49.8) [42.7 to 56.8] | 112 (51.9) [45.0 to 58.7] | −2.1 (−11.6 to 7.5) | −2.1 (−11.3 to 7.1) | 0.96 (0.80 to 1.16) | 0.95 (0.80 to 1.14) |
Locally assessed bpCR | ||||||
Responders, No. (%) [95% CI] | 126 (52.9) [46.4 to 59.4] | 127 (53.8) [47.2 to 60.3] | −0.9 (−10.0 to 8.2) | −0.4 (−9.2 to 8.5) | 0.98 (0.83 to 1.16) | 0.95 (0.81 to 1.12) |
Centrally assessed bpCR | ||||||
Responders, No. (%) [95% CI] | 129 (56.3) [49.6 to 62.9] | 123 (53.9) [47.2 to 60.5] | 2.4 (−7.0 to 11.6) | 2.8 (−6.2 to 11.7) | 1.04 (0.89 to 1.23) | 1.02 (0.87 to 1.19) |
Overall response at the end of neoadjuvant treatment | ||||||
Responders, No. (%) | 217 (91.2) | 210 (89.0) | 2.2 (−6.7 to 11.3) | 1.5 (−3.9 to 6.9) | 1.03 (0.97 to 1.09) | 1.02 (0.96 to 1.08) |
Abbreviations: bpCR, breast pathological complete response; NA, not applicable; PPS, per-protocol set; tpCR, total pathological complete response.
Primary end point. The confidence interval was contained between the prespecified margins of equivalence (−15% to 15%). All confidence intervals were contained between the prespecified margins defining equivalence for the primary end point.
Adjusted for stratification factors. The effect of the stratification factors was evaluated using an adapted logistic model comprising a combination of logistic, binomial, and log-binomial regression (referred to as adapted logistic regression).