Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;8(5):687–696. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.8116

Table 2. Mediation Analysis Estimations for Racial Disparity in Prostate MRI Receipt.

Mediator Log odds (95% CI) Relative effects (95% CI)
Comparison of race identified as Black vs White a
Direct effects −0.07 (−0.15 to −0.01) 0.19 (0.02 to 0.36)
Indirect effects −0.28 (−0.33 to −0.22) 0.81 (0.64 to 0.98)
Dual Medicaid eligibility −0.04 (−0.05 to −0.03) 0.11 (0.07 to 0.16)
High-poverty area −0.07 (−0.1 to −0.04) 0.19 (0.11 to 0.28)
Regional use of prostate cancer imaging 0.001 (0 to 0.003) −0.003 (−0.008 to 0.001)
SEER registry −0.08 (−0.12 to −0.05) 0.24 (0.14 to 0.32)
ICE group −0.07 (−0.11 to −0.03) 0.19 (0.10 to 0.29)
Total −0.34 (−0.43 to −0.27) NA
Comparison of race identified as Black vs other a , b
Direct effects −0.03 (−0.08 to 0.006) 0.08 (−0.02 to 0.26)
Indirect effects −0.32 (−0.41 to −0.22) 0.92 (0.74 to 1.02)
High-poverty area −0.05 (−0.098 to −0.014) 0.15 (0.04 to 0.28)
Regional use of prostate cancer imaging −0.002 (−0.007 to 0) 0.006 (0 to 0.018)
SEER registry −0.19 (−0.28 to −0.10) 0.54 (0.34 to 0.74)
ICE group −0.07 (−0.13 to −0.04) 0.22 (0.10 to 0.36)
Total −0.35 (−0.45 to −0.25) NA

Abbreviations: ICE, Index of Concentration at the Extreme; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not applicable; SEER, Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results.

a

Models adjusted for modified Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score.

b

Dual Medicaid eligibility was not an eligible mediator for this comparison.