Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 20;31(5):792–802. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddab263

Table 1.

Top-associated SNPs of the meta-analysis of both GWAS on plasma α-Klotho levels

SNP Chr. EA OA EAF Gene β SE P Pair-wise Z P_Z
rs12607664 18 T G 31.61 CHST9 0.243 0.022 2.28 × 10−27 3.337 0.001
rs8176672 9 T C 7.18 ABO 0.406 0.041 2.11 × 10−23 1.785 0.074
rs532436 9 G A 23.99 ABO 0.204 0.026 5.86 × 10−15 0.691 0.490
rs1056008 12 C T 26.82 B4GALNT3 0.184 0.024 1.80 × 10−14 0.478 0.632
rs7333961 13 A G 4.62 KL −0.327 0.051 1.73 × 10−10 0.816 0.415
rs881301 8 C T 41.28 FGFR1 −0.119 0.021 2.23 × 10−08 0.087 0.931

The effect size (β) represents SD difference in α-Klotho relative to the mean (i.e. Z-score) per effect allele. Results show univariate/simple linear regression estimates for the six conditionally independent SNPs. The effect size (β) represents SD difference in α-Klotho relative to the mean (i.e. Z-scores) per effect allele. Chr., chromosome; EA, effect allele; OA, other allele; EAF, effect allele frequency in the pooled sample in percentage; SE, standard error. Pair-wise Z and P_Z are the pair-wise Z estimating the difference between two effect estimates (in LURIC and ALSPAC) and P-value of the Z-score.