Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;22:76. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02527-7

Table 1.

Basic characteristics and clinical data of study population

Variables Normal control (n = 252) Three-vessel CAD patients* P-value
All patients (n = 252) Low EFV level (< 118 mL, n = 125) High EFV level (≥ 118 mL, n = 127)
EFV (mL) 89 ± 32 120 ± 42 86 ± 21 154 ± 29 < 0.001#
EFV/BSA (mL/m2) 48 ± 19 65 ± 22 49 ± 12 82 ± 16 < 0.001#
Epicardial FAI (HU) − 84 ± 9 − 81 ± 5 − 78 ± 4 − 84 ± 4 < 0.001#
Cardiovascular risk factors
 Age (years) 61 ± 8 61 ± 8 61 ± 9 62 ± 7 0.163
 Male sex, n (%) 193 (77) 193 (77) 93 (74) 100 (79) 0.416
 BMI (kg/m2) 25 ± 3 25 ± 3 24 ± 3 26 ± 3 < 0.001
 Smoking, n (%) 37 (19) 125 (50) 60 (48) 65 (51) 0.614
 Hypertension, n (%) 0 (0) 179 (71) 85 (68) 94 (74) 0.293
 Dyslipidemia, n (%) 0 (0) 45 (19) 21 (17) 24 (19) 0.664
 Diabetes, n (%) 0 (0) 104 (41) 48 (38) 56 (44) 0.359
 CAD family history, n (%) 0 (0) 29 (12) 17 (14) 12 (9) 0.302
LV functional parameters
 LV diameter (mm) 48 ± 3.8 48 ± 4.3 48 ± 4.5 49 ± 4.0 0.023
 LVEF (%) 61 ± 5.0 60 ± 6.0 60 ± 6.4 60 ± 5.6 0.911
 E/A 1.6 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.4 0.056
Invasive coronary angiography
 CCC status, n (%) NA 78 (31) 40 (32) 38 (30) 0.721
 SYNTAX score NA 29 (23, 36) 30 (23, 36) 29 (23, 35) 0.793

CAD coronary artery disease, EFV epicardial fat volume, BSA body surface area, FAI fat attenuation index, BMI body mass index, LV left ventricular, EF ejection fraction, CCC coronary collateral circulation

*Patients were divided into two subgroups according to median EFV level (118 mL)

#P values refer to the comparison between three-vessel CAD patients and normal controls. The remaining P values refer to comparisons between the low and high EFV level subgroups of the CAD patients