Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;44(1):407–414. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2043903

Table 3.

Relationship between PPI and the adverse prognosis.

  HR (95%CI) p Value
All-cause mortality    
 Unadjusted 1.52 (1.07–2.15) .019
 Model 1 1.67 (1.15–2.41) .006
 Model 2 1.46 (1.01–2.10) .044
 Model 3 1.47 (1.02–2.13) .042
 IPTW 1.35 (1.09–1.67) .006
New-onset CVE    
 Unadjusted 1.64 (1.06–2.54) .026
 Model 1 1.89 (1.19–3.00) .007
 Model 2 1.72 (1.08–2.74) .022
 Model 3 1.80 (1.13–2.87) .014
 IPTW 1.78 (1.35–2.32) <.001

Model 1: sex, age, center.

Model 2:

All-cause mortality: Model 1 plus comorbid conditions (diabetes, SBP, history of CVD, history of gastrointestinal bleeding, β-blocker).

New-onset CVE: Model 1 plus comorbid conditions (diabetes, SBP, history of gastrointestinal bleeding, β-blocker).

Model 3: Model 2 plus uric acid, total cholesterol, Kt/V, RRF.

IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighted method; PPI: proton pump inhibitor; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; CVD: cardiovascular disease; CVE: cardiovascular event; SBP: systolic pressure; Kt/V: K – dialyzer clearance of urea, t – dialysis time, V – volume of distribution of urea; RRF: residual renal function.

Note: Reference group is the non-PPI group.