Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Magn Reson. 2020 Oct 28;52(8):971–994. doi: 10.1007/s00723-020-01288-w

Table 1:

Cw-EPR spectral analysis for TauD derivatives

Sample |E|/D (±0.001) g (± 0.002) Fraction σE/D (± 0.003)
TauD[taurine]NO 0.006 2.008, 2.002 0.30 ± 0.05 0.005
0.016 2.010, 2.002 0.70 0.014
TauD[2-OG]NO 0.014 2.023, 2.006 0.81 ± 0.05 0.016
0.048 2.028, 2.006 0.19 0.024
TauD[taurine, 2-OG]NO 0.006 2.016, 2.001 0.71 ± 0.10 0.005
0.017 2.011, 2.001 0.29 0.012

D = 3 x 105 MHz (10 cm−1) for all simulations. Error estimates were based on parameter changes that led to an increase of one standard deviation in χn2.