Table 1. A summary of biomaterials used for retinal tissue engineering.
Biomaterial | Thickness (μm) | Advantages | Studies | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Collagen type I membrane | 7 | Non-toxic, no inflammatory response, controllable, stability (10 weeks), degrade (within 24 weeks) | Long term biocompatibility and membrane degradation evaluated (rabbits) | (Bhatt et al., 1994; Booij et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2007; Thumann et al., 2009) |
| ||||
Gelatin | 30–35 | Lower immunogenicity, crosslinking ability, and better solubility in aqueous systems | Biocompatibility, improved survival, and formation of laminar structures (rabbits) | (Hsiue et al., 2002; Lai and Li, 2010) |
| ||||
Alginate | Thin film | Purified alginate- high cell proliferative rate | Ability to support the growth of RPE cells and their high proliferative rates (in vitro) | (Heidari et al., 2015; Hunt et al., 2017; Jeong et al., 2011) |
| ||||
Silk Fibroin | 3 | Great mechanical strength, good biodegradability, and biocompatibility | Evaluate BMSF as a substrate for RPE cell transplantation (in vitro) | (Shadforth et al., 2012; Tran et al., 2018) |
| ||||
PLGA | Remarkable mechanical properties, adjustable degradation rates (80–90 days), and good processability | To demonstrate safety and cell integration in the eye (rodent and porcine preclinical models) | (Pan and Ding, 2012; Sharma et al., 2019) | |
| ||||
PCL | 20–40 | Thinnest scaffold, permeable, slow degradation, adverse tissue responses not observed | Assess the tolerance and durability of micro and nanostructured PCL thin films (rabbits) | (Bernards et al., 2013; Redenti et al., 2008) |
| ||||
PTMC | 100 | Elastomeric properties similar to BM, thickness tunable | Demonstrate adherence and maturation of hESC-RPE cells on PTMC compared to PDLLA films | (Sorkio et al., 2017) |
| ||||
PMMA | 6 | Reduced risk of trauma | Evaluate adhesion of RPCs and its differentiation and migration to host retina (mice) | (Tao et al., 2007) |
| ||||
PGS | 45 | A suitable candidate for RPC delivery with great novel properties | Evaluate mechanical properties | (Neeley et al., 2008) |
| ||||
Parylene-C | 0.15–0.30, 0.3 μm thickness supported on a 6.0 μm thick mesh frame | Macromolecules and nutrients can diffuse, nonimmunogenic, Promotes cell adhesion after vitronectin/matrigel coating | Evaluate safety, survival, and functionality of hESC-RPE cells on parylene in animal models | (Kashani et al., 2018; Koss et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2012; Thomas et al., 2016) |
|
|
|||
0.3 μm thickness supported on a 6.0 μm thick mesh frame | Assess safety and efficacy of hESC-RPE on parylene in patients with AMD. (clinical study) | |||
|
|
|||
Check cell adherence and proliferation (in vitro) | ||||
| ||||
PLLA & PLGA | Week 1: 133.1 Week 2: 131.5 Week 3: 103.5 |
25:75 (PLLA: PLGA) thinnest, most porous, and minimal cell death | Evaluate the variety of suitable scaffolds for RPE transplantation (in vitro) | (Thomson et al., 2011) |
| ||||
SF & PLCL | 60–100 | Quick RPC proliferation, preferential differentiation towards retinal neurons like photoreceptors | Understand effects of blended nanofibrous membranes of silk fibroin and PLCL (in vitro) | (Zhang et al., 2015) |
| ||||
Honeycomb like films and collagen IV | Increased hydrophilicity, high permeability | Investigate honeycomb-like film as a promising scaffold for hESC-RPE tissue engineering | (Calejo et al., 2016) | |
| ||||
PNIPAAm - Thermoresponsive polymer | scalable | Allows cell sheet harvest by temperature reduction from 37–20 °C | Demonstrate fabrication of transplantable retinal pigment epithelium cell sheets | (Kubota et al., 2006; Kushida et al., 1999) |
| ||||
Decellularized matrix | 10–20 | micro- and macro-scale structural components and functional ECM proteins present Photoreceptor differentiation | Develop novel biomaterial by decellularizing retina using ionic detergents | (Kundu et al., 2016) |