Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 29;12(1):58–70. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_257_21

Table 5.

Experiment 2 (Arrest Study) descriptive statistics for mineral loss difference

Difference Treatment Mean 95% CI SD Median IQR
Lower Upper
Baseline-intervention SAPR 8,841.05 5,856.55 11,825.54 5,490.28 9,799.00 8,828.80
FV 6,423.55 3,831.49 9,015.61 4,581.29 6,076.05 5,190.08
CPP-ACPF 7,876.33 5,423.65 10,329.01 4,682.27 8,071.90 6,801.03
RI 4,442.78 3,580.10 5,305.47 1,587.00 4,949.70 1,637.20
Demineralized-intervention SAPR 4,392.39 1,739.18 7,045.60 4,880.84 5,202.40 7,279.80
FV 950.45 -689.53 2,590.43 2,898.55 1,177.50 2,632.43
CPP-ACPF 3,199.59 1,200.68 5,198.51 3,816.02 2,249.60 6,503.62
RI 1,314.48 715.32 1,913.65 1,102.22 1,271.60 903.10

95% CI = 95% confidence interval for the mean, SD = standard deviation, IQR = interquartile range, SAPR = self-assembling peptide for repair, FV = fluoride varnish, CPP-ACPF= casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride, RI = resin infiltration