Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 1;117(3):413–423. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001625

Table 3:

Prevalence of endoscopically detected gastric abnormalities specified by region amongst cohort with prospective endoscopic assessment using EG-REFS

Fundus N=64 Body N=64 Antrum N=65 Highest score of 3 locations N=65
Total Score: median (interquartile range) 0 (0, 0) 1 (0, 2) 2 (1, 5) 3 (1,5)
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Granularity
0 57 (89) 48 (75) 46 (71) 42 (65)
1 6 (9) 10 (16) 12 (18) 16 (25)
2 1 (2) 6 (9) 7 (11) 7 (10)
Erosion/Ulceration
0 62 (97) 54 (84) 38 (58) 35 (55)
1 1 (2) 5 (8) 13 (20) 14 (22)
2 0 2 (3) 7 (11) 8 (12)
3 0 2 (3) 5 (8) 5 (8)
4 0 1 (2) 1 (2) 1 (1)
5 0 0 1 (2) 1 (1)
6 1 (2) 0 0 1 (1)
Raised lesion
0 60 (94) 46 (72) 38 (58) 33 (51)
1 1 (2) 12 (19) 15 (23) 17 (26)
2 3 (5) 6 (9) 12 (18) 15 (23)
Erythema
0 56 (88) 35(55) 21 (32) 18 (28)
1 6 (9) 22 (34) 34 (52) 35 (54)
2 2 (3) 7 (11) 10 (15) 12 (18)
Friability/Bleeding
0 61 (95) 56 (88) 50 (77) 48 (74)
1 2 (3) 7 (11) 12 (18) 13 (20)
2 1 (2) 1 (2) 3 (5) 4 (6)
Folds
0 63 (98) 60 (94) 56 (86) 54 (83)
1 1 (2) 4 (6) 9 (14) 11 (17)
Stenosis
0 NA NA 64 (99) 64 (99)
1 NA NA 1 (2) 1 (2)