Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;12:3593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07594-6

Table 3.

Differentially abundant OTUs in the family Bacteroidaceae/ Lachnospiraceae/ Bifidobacteriaceae between total and live bacteria in the LM.

Family Taxonomic annotation Similarity (%) Relative abundance (%) padj log2FC
Bacteroidaceae Bacteroides vulgatus 100 6.21 0.0014 1.0
Bacteroides dorei 100 5.08 0.00058 1.5
Bacteroides uniformis 100 4.61 1.3e−06 1.8
Bacteroides ovatus 99.4 2.54 4.2e−05 1.9
Bacteroides xylanisolvens 100 1.67 4.2e−05 1.5
Bacteroides ovatus 99 0.75 0.0057 1.4
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron 99.1 0.43 0.00040 1.6
Lachnospiraceae Anaerostipes hadrus 100 2.30 0.0024 − 1.8
Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans 99.7 1.70 4.2e−05 − 1.6
[Ruminococcus] gnavus 100 1.13 0.00024 − 1.3
Anaerostipes hadrus 99.7 0.72 0.00038 − 1.9
Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans 96.3 0.65 0.0065 − 1.6
[Clostridium] indolis 94.5 0.19 0.0024 − 2.5
Bifidobacteriaceae Bifidobacterium longum infantis 99.4 3.49 0.0097 0.9

The LM samples (n = 80; ten subjects, total/live over four gut sites) were used in DESeq2 analysis with full model of ~ subject + gut_sites + live and reduced model of ~ subject + gut_sites, where "live" means live or total bacteria.

Criteria for inclusion: padj < 0.01.

Relative abundance; mean on relative abundance of normalized counts for subset samples.

padj: the Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted P value.

log2FC: log2(live/total).

LM luminal microbiota, OTU operational taxonomic unit.