Table 2.
Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies
| References | Item 1 | Item 2 | Item 3 | Item 4 | Item 5 | Item 6 | Item 7 | Item 8 | Item 9 | Item 10 | Item 11 | Item 12 | Item 13 | Item 14 | Scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrade et al. [44] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 4/8 |
| Andrade Nogueira et al. [25] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Barnes et al. [19] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | 6/8 |
| Barroso et al. [26] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Barroso et al. [38] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Brink et al. [5] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Brink et al. [39] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | 6/8 |
| Cruz et al. [27] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Doeven et al. [40] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Figueiredo et al. [15] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | 6/8 |
| Foster et al. [17] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Ieno et al. [28] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Imamura et al. [41] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Inoue et al. [29] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Kraft et al. [30] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Lupo et al. [45] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | 6/8 |
| Medina et al. [42] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | No | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 4/8 |
| Murphy et al. [49] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | 6/8 |
| Nogueira et al. [31] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Oytun et al. [46] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Rabelo et al. [20] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Redkva et al. [16] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Rodrigues-Marroyo et al. [47] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Scantlebury et al. [32] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | 6/8 |
| Sinnott-O'Connor et al. [33] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Vaquera et al. [43] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Viveiros et al. [48] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Voet et al. [34] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
| Wallace et al. [18] | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | 5/8 |
Item 1: Was the research question or objective in this paper clearly stated?; Item 2: Was the study population clearly specified and defined?; Item 3: Was the participation rate of eligible persons at least 50%?; Item 4: Were all the subjects selected or recruited from the same or similar populations (including the same time period)? Were inclusion and exclusion criteria for being in the study prespecified and applied uniformly to all participants?; Item 5: Was a sample size justification, power description, or variance and effect estimates provided?; Item 6: For the analyses in this paper, were the exposure(s) of interest measured prior to the outcome(s) being measured?; Item 7: Was the timeframe sufficient so that one could reasonably expect to see an association between exposure and outcome if it existed?; Item 8: For exposures that can vary in amount or level, did the study examine different levels of the exposure as related to the outcome (e.g., categories of exposure, or exposure measured as continuous variable)?; Item 9: Were the exposure measures (independent variables) clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants?; Item 10: Was the exposure(s) assessed more than once over time?; Item 11: Were the outcome measures (dependent variables) clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants?; Item 12: Were the outcome assessors blinded to the exposure status of participants?; Item 13: Was loss to follow-up after baseline 20% or less?; Item 14: Were key potential confounding variables measured and adjusted statistically for their impact on the relationship between exposure(s) and outcome(s)?; NA: Not applicable. Items 6 and 7 were answered with “No” in all 29 studies according to the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Items 3, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 13 were considered not applicable to the cross-sectional studies included in this review