Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;77:103911. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103911

Table 2.

AUC with 95% confidence intervals for the validation and external test set for each prediction model, benchmarked against models based on TNM-stage and performance status.

Outcome Validation Set
External Test Set
AUC 95% CI AUC 95% CI
RFS Our prediction model 0·682 0·575–0·788 0·681 0·597–0·766
TNM based model 0·650 0·541–0·760 0·695 0·616–0·774
PS based model 0·464 0·363–0·565 0·499 0·418–0·58
Recurrence Our prediction model 0·687 0·582–0·793 0·722 0·635–0·810
TNM based model 0·670 0·563–0·777 0·707 0·622–0·791
PS based model 0·506 0·402–0·609 0·584 0·503–0·665
OS Our prediction model 0·759 0·663–0·855 0·717 0·634–0·800
TNM based model 0·649 0·541–0·756 0·665 0·579–0·751
PS based model 0·459 0·357–0·561 0·531 0·447–0·615