Table 3.
Students’ response to tele-OSCE (N = 17)
| Domain | Statements | SA (%) | A (%) | N (%) | D (%) | SD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of operation | I found the Microsoft Teams meeting easy to use | 41 | 53 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| I have a good understanding and skills on using Microsoft Teams prior to Tele-OSCE | 35 | 47 | 0 | 12 | 6 | |
| I need more technical training on using Microsoft Teams prior to Tele-OSCE | 0 | 29 | 0 | 47 | 24 | |
| Technical difficulties | My Tele-OSCE interaction with the Microsoft Team software was clear and understandable | 41 | 41 | 0 | 12 | 6 |
| I did not experience technical difficulties during Tele-OSCE | 29 | 47 | 0 | 18 | 6 | |
| I did experience technical difficulties during Tele-OSCE but it was solved easily | 18 | 18 | 47 | 12 | 6 | |
| Ease of performance | I found the Microsoft Teams videoconferencing software made it easy for me to make eye contact with patient/simulated actor during Tele-OSCE | 29 | 53 | 0 | 18 | 0 |
| I found the Microsoft Team videoconferencing software made it easy for me to demonstrate empathy during Tele-OSCE | 18 | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0 | |
| I feel equally prepared to undergo Tele-OSCE and OSCE in person | 47 | 35 | 0 | 18 | 0 | |
| General attitudes towards tele-OSCE | I think Tele-OSCE is a good alternative to face-to-face OSCE during crises/pandemic | 53 | 35 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| I think Tele-OSCE must be incorporated into curriculum to prepare future use of telemedicine in health care sectors | 35 | 53 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
SA, strongly agree; A, agree; N, neutral; D, disagree; SD, strongly disagree