Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;22:301. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07624-z

Table 2.

The number of patients in the study sample at each stage of the CrAg Screening Cascade, stratified by urban/rural status of the health facility where their record was reviewed and overall (n = 359)

Stage on the CrAg cascade Location of site P-value
Urban Rural Overall
Number: Proportion % (95% CI) Number: Proportion % (95% CI) Number: Proportion % (95% CI)
Patients with CD4 ≤ 100 μ/ml 209 (58.2) 150 (41.8) 359 (100.0)
Patients with CrAg screen 170: 81.3 (75.4–86.4) 85: 56.7 (48.3–64.7) 255: 71.0 (66.0–75.7) < 0.001
Patients screened for CrAg within 7 days of a CD4 test 138: 81.2 (74.5–86.8) 72: 84.7 (75.3–91.6) 210: 82.4 (53.4–63.8) 0.489
Patients with CrAg screen contacted with results 170: 100.0 (97.9–100.0) 82: 96.5 (90.0–99.3) 252: 98.8 (96.6–99.8) 0.014
Patients with a CrAg positive result 48: 28.2 (21.5–35.0) 8: 9.4 (4.2–17.7) 56: 22.0 (17.0–27.5) 0.001
Patients screen for signs and symptoms of CNS infection 43: 89.6 (77.3–96.5) 7: 87.5 (47.3–99.7) 50: 89.3 (78.1–96.0) 0.860
Patients in whom a lumbar puncture was done 39: 81.3 (67.4–91.1) 0: 0 (0.0–0.0) 39: 69.6 (55.9–81.2)
Patients started on pre-emptive fluconazole therapy 39: 81.3 (67.4–91.1) 8: 100.0 (63.1–100.0) 47: 83.9 (71.7–92.4) 0.181
Patients started on fluconazole that were still receiving pre-emptive fluconazole at 6 months 5: 12.8 (4.5–28.8) 3: 37.5 (8.5–75.5) 8: 17.0 (7.6–30.8) 0.108
Patients who were started on ART 183: 87.6 (82.3–91.7) 149: 99.3 (96.3–100.0) 332: 92.5 (89.2–95.0) < 0.001
Patients who were started on ART prior to CrAg screening 130: 71.0 (63.9–77.5) 53: 35.6 (27.9–43.8) 129: 38.9 (33.6–44.3) < 0.001
Patients with a CD4 ≤ 100 μ/ml that were reportedly alive at the time of data collection 110: 52.6 (45.6–59.6) 103: 68.7 (60.6–76.0) 213: 59.3 (54.1–64.5) 0.002