Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 20;191(2):349–359. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab253

Table 2.

Difference in “True” Versus Estimated Effects of Depression on Stroke Risk on the Log Odds Scale Under Different Theoretical Life-Course Models When Information Regarding Early-Life Exposure Is Missinga

Effect (Log RR) of Depression on Stroke Risk
Direct Effect of Depression Lifetime Effect of Depression
Depression in Midlife Depression in Late Life
Theoretical Model Under Which Data Were Generated Depression in Early Life (“True” Effect (Inline graphic3)) “True”
Effect ( Inline graphic 2 )
Estimated Effect ( Inline graphic 2 ) % Bias b “True”
Effect ( Inline graphic 1 )
Estimated Effect ( Inline graphic 1 ) % Bias b “True” Effect ( Inline graphic +Inline graphic+Inline graphic) Estimated Effect ( Inline graphic +Inline graphic) % Bias b
Accumulation model 0.69 0.69 0.75 9 0.69 0.76 10 2.07 1.51 −27
Early-life critical period model 1.10 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.10 1.10 0.20 −82
Pathway model 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 1.10 0 1.10 1.10 0
Accumulation model with increasing effect across the life course 0.41 0.69 0.73 6 0.92 0.96 5 2.02 1.69 −16
Accumulation model with decreasing effect across the life course 0.92 0.69 0.77 122 0.41 0.50 22 2.02 1.27 −37

Abbreviation: RR, risk ratio.

a The true direct effect of depression on stroke was set to 0.69, and there were 10,000 replications with 100,000 people in each sample unless otherwise stated. Estimates were obtained from conventional logistic regression models.

b Percent bias = [(average of 10,000 estimated effect − true effect)/true effect] × 100.