Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 15;26(3):2949–2963. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04277-w

Table 1.

EDS elemental analysis for both untreated and plasma treatment (+ CAP) surfaces (mean SEM)

surface material Ti [mass%] C [mass%] O [mass%] Ca [mass%] P [mass%] Y [mass%] Zr [mass%] Al [mass%]
Titanium 92.5 ± 1.39 7.4 ± 1.39 - - - - - -
Titanium + CAP 91.5 ± 0.72 8.4 ± 0.72 - - - - - -
Bonit - - 78.1 ± 0.60 11.9 ± 0.43 9.8 ± 0.14 ** - -
Bonit + CAP - - 78.4 ± 0.44 11.7 ± 0.33 9.6 ± 0.13 ** - -
Ziraldent - - 68.1 ± 1.12 - - 1.5 ± 0.06 21.4 ± 1.36 12.3 ± 0.14
Ziraldent + CAP - - 67.4 ± 0.85 - - 1.5 ± 0.03 20.7 ± 0.80 11.5 ± 1.06
Zircapore - n.s 65.4 ± 2.48 - - 1.9 ± 0.09 27.8 ± 1.37 0.99 ± 0.09
Zircapore + CAP - n.s 61.1 ± 5.35 - - 1.6 ± 0.15 24.8 ± 2.05 1.3 ± 0.66

Tr titanium; C: carbon: O: oxygen; Ca: calcium: P: phosphate: Y: yttrium: Zr: zirconium: AI: aluminium. **Only trace amounts were present; n.s: data not significant