Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct 9;26(3):2453–2463. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04211-0

Table 3.

Among the teeth for which the dentist recommended monitoring at baseline (Y0; N=1,688), comparison of the characteristics of the teeth whose dentist’s recommendation changed to treat during follow-up (restore; N=232 [14%]) to the characteristics of the teeth whose recommendation remained to monitor*

Recommended Treat after Y0
ALL1 Column % N Row %2 P 3 OR 4
Patient male 563 36% 104 18% 0.001 OR = 1.6
   Patient female 1015 64% 128 13%
Biting pain anytime Y0-Y3 172 11% 64 37% <0.001 OR = 4.5
   No biting pain Y0-Y3 1407 89% 168 12%
Spontaneous pain anytime Y0-Y3 148 9% 40 27% <0.001 OR = 2.6
   No spontaneous pain Y0-3 1431 91% 192 13%
Any fracture Y1-Y3 50 3% 40 80% <0.001 OR = 29.1
   No fractures developed 1529 97% 192 13%
Caries present on tooth at Y1 or Y2 33 2% 27 82% <0.001 OR = 27.6
   No caries present at Y1 or Y2 1546 95% 205 13%
Wear facet on tooth at Y1 or Y2 405 26% 80 20% <0.001 OR = 1.7
   No wear facet on tooth at Y1 or Y2 1174 74% 152 13%
Roots exposed on tooth 486 31% 87 18% 0.04 OR = 1.4
   No roots exposed on tooth 1093 69% 145 13%

(N=109) teeth treated during follow-up that had not stated recommendation for treatment were excluded

1

Column Ns not summing to 1,688 due to missing data.

2

Percent within level of row characteristic.

3

Significance of differences in proportions of column heading adjusted only for clustering of patients within practitioner.

4

OR: Odds ratios (only for dichotomous variables)