Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 30;113(3):904–915. doi: 10.1111/cas.15246

TABLE 1.

Summary of tumor formation in cervical cancer xenografts

Cells Tumor formationa
HCK1T tet‐off
‐tre HPV16E6E7‐MYCT58A – HRASG12V 8/8 (39)
‐tre HPV16E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V 8/8 (59)
‐tre HPV16E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V + FOXA2 8/8 (48)
‐tre HPV16E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V + SMAD4mi 5/8 (95)
‐tre HPV16E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V + SMAD4mi + FOXA2 5/8 (100)
‐tre HPV16E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V (DOX +) 0/4 (100)
HCK1T tet‐off
‐tre HPV18E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V 3/4 (100)
‐tre HPV18E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V + FOXA2 3/4 (100)
‐tre HPV18E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V + SMAD4mi 4/4 (100)
‐tre HPV18E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V + SMAD4mi + FOXA2 4/4 (100)
‐tre HPV18E6E7‐MYCT58A – KRASG12V (DOX+) 0/4 (100)

Incidence of tumor formation within 100 days of observation period.

a(Number of tumors)/(number of transplantations) are indicated. Mice were killed when the average tumor volume reached >600 mm3. Mice whose tumors did not attain 600 mm3 were killed at day 100 and tumors were collected. Numbers in parentheses indicate the time (d) until mice were killed.