Table 4.
Panel A: k = US | Panel B: k = China | Panel C: k = Others | ||||
(1) | (2) | (1) | (2) | (1) | (2) | |
Dk,t | -0.0238 | 0.1332*** | 0.0804*** | |||
(-0.64) | (3.56) | (3.73) | ||||
DII,k,t | -0.0190 | 0.3176*** | 0.0722* | |||
(-0.35) | (5.75) | (1.95) | ||||
DIII,k,t | 0.1773* | 0.1664** | 0.1652*** | |||
(2.00) | (2.66) | (4.20) | ||||
ϕIII,k minus ϕII,k | N/A | 0.1964* | N/A | -0.1512** | N/A | 0.0930* |
(1.91) | (-2.07) | (1.74) |
The table reports the empirical estimates of regression Eqs. (1) and (2), except that in the current table, Dt and Dj,t are replaced by Dk,t and Dj,k,t with k = US in Panel A, China in Panel B and other countries in Panel C. For example, DUS,t takes the value of 1 if day t is the first day of clinical trial phases and the vac-country is the U.S. In all the columns of each panel, to construct Dk,t and Dj,k,t we use all vaccines developed by that vac-country k. The last row reports the differences between the loading on phase II and phase III dummy variables with t-statistics presented in parentheses. The sample period covers from January 2, 2020, to April 30, 2021. *, **, *** denote significance levels at 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively.