Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;11(2):253–259. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-8

Table 1. Comparison of the usage of physically delayed condoms in the premature ejaculation and the control group.

Projects Groups Ordinary condom Thickened condom P value
Contraceptive safety Premature ejaculation group 100/100 100/100 >0.5
Control group 30/30 30/30 >0.5
Comfort Premature ejaculation group 80/100 60/100 <0.05
Control group 16/30 13/30 >0.5
Dorsal nerve conduction velocity of penis (m/s) Premature ejaculation group 30.5±2.7 21.0±1.9 <0.05
Control group 23.9±1.7 22.6±1.2 >0.5
Ejaculation latency Premature ejaculation group (>3 min) 16/100 78/100 <0.05
Control group (>5 min) 26/30 29/30 >0.5
Glans sensitivity (penile vibration threshold) (level) Underside
Premature ejaculation group 23±2.7 40±1.4 <0.05
Control group 35±2.0 45±1.2 <0.05
Left
Premature ejaculation group 28±1.5 46±2.5 <0.05
Control group 49±2.5 59±2.4 <0.05
Right
Premature ejaculation group 30±2.3 45±2.1 <0.05
Control group 52±1.8 63±1.9 <0.05
Upper side
Premature ejaculation group 46±2.7 55±1.6 <0.05
Control group 61±1.7 67±2.7 >0.05
Total
Premature ejaculation group 29±2.5 47±2.0 <0.05
Control group 50±2.1 59±1.8 <0.05