Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;11(2):253–259. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-8

Table 3. Effect of physical delayed condom on reproductive hormone of participants.

Objects Groups Ordinary condom Thickened condom P value
Luteinizing hormone (mIU/mL) Premature ejaculation group 5.4±0.8 5.9±0.7 >0.5
Control group 6.1±1.0 5.2±1.2 >0.5
Follicle stimulating hormone (mIU/mL) Premature ejaculation group 12.5±1.6 11.2±1.8 >0.5
Control group 10.4±1.1 9.5±0.9 >0.5
Prolactin (ng/mL) Premature ejaculation group 13.6±1.7 12.9±1.2 >0.5
Control group 11.6±1.4 12.2±1.5 >0.5
Progesterone (ng/mL) Premature ejaculation group 1.2±0.13 1.1±0.09 >0.5
Control group 0.8±0.06 0.9±0.10 >0.5
Estradiol (pg/mL) Premature ejaculation group 88±14 85±11 >0.5
Control group 56±9 53±12 >0.5
Testosterone (ng/dL) Premature ejaculation group 137±12 165±13 <0.05
Control group 231±22 245±21 >0.5