Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 6;26(5):1722–1723. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17194

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

LKB1IP deficiency alleviates ISO‐induced cardiac hypertrophy. (A) Representative M‐mode echocardiography of the left ventricle (top). Measurement of diastolic interventricular septal thickness (IVSd), systolic interventricular septal thickness (IVSs), diastolic left ventricular posterior wall (LVPWd) and systolic left ventricular posterior wall (LVPWs) in the indicated groups (n = 5). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001 vs. WT Saline; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. WT ISO. (B) Quantitative analysis of ratio of heart weight to body weight (HW/BW) in the indicated groups (n = 5). **p < 0.01 vs. WT Saline; # p < 0.05 vs. WT ISO. (C) Quantitative analysis of ratio of HW to tibial length (TL) in the indicated groups (n=5). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.05 vs. WT Saline; # p < 0.05 vs. WT ISO. (D) Analysis of whole hearts (the first row; scale bar, 1000 μm) and heart sections stained with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA; the second row; scale bar, 50 μm) or picosirius red (PSR; the third and fourth rows; scale bars, 50 μm) from the indicated groups 7 days after saline or ISO treatment. (E) Quantitative analysis of the average cardiomyocyte cross‐sectional area in the indicated groups, n > 100 cells per group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. WT Saline; ## p < 0.01 vs. WT ISO. (F) Quantitative analysis of left ventricle (LV) collagen volume in the indicated groups, n > 15 fields per group. **p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. WT Saline; ### p < 0.001 vs. WT ISO. (G) Quantitative PCR analysis of ANP, BNP and β‐MHC mRNA levels in the indicated groups (n = 3). *p < 0.05 vs. WT Saline; # p < 0.05 vs. WT ISO