Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Jun 10;34(7-8):1411–1452. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1769192

Table 3.

Test of Intelligence

Test Name Study Population Characteristics Video Modality Connection Speed Delay Between Assessments Findings Administration Notes
Matrix Reasoning Hildebrand (2004) * N = 29 HC from Canada, Mage = 68 (SD = 8), Meducation = 13 (SD = 3), MMMSE = 28.9 (SD = 1.3); 73% Female Videoconferencing systems (LC5000, VTEL) with two 81cm monitors and far-end camera control. Conducted on-site 336 kbit/s 2–4 weeks apart No difference in mean score across conditions (Limits of agreeement −4.56 – 6.08) Pictures of the visual test material were presented using a document camera (Elmo Visual Presenter, EV400 AF).

Vocabulary Hildebrand (2004) * N = 29 HC from Canada, Mage = 68 (SD = 8), Meducation = 13 (SD = 3), MMMSE = 28.9 (SD = 1.3); 73% Female Videoconferencing systems (LC5000, VTEL) with two 81cm monitors and far-end camera control. Conducted on-site 336 kbit/s 2–4 weeks apart No difference in mean score across conditions (Limits of agreeement −3.07 – 3.13)

Notes.

*

indicates a study from Brearly et al., (2017)