Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):469–489.

Table 3.

Statistical associations between CCNB2 protein expression and the clinic-pathological factors in Nottingham breast cancer cohort (n=3178)

Nottingham Breast Cancer Cohort

Parameters CCNB2 protein

Number % Mean Rank P-value
Patient Age (year)
    ≤50 1042 (33) 1672.3 <0.0001
    >50 2131 (67) 1545.3
Tumour Size
    ≤2 cm 1768 (56) 1555.6 0.032
    >2 cm 1403 (44) 1624.3
Tumour Grade
    1 543 (17) 1314.0 <0.0001
    2 1131 (36) 1503.9
    3 1496 (47) 1745.7
Mitosis
    1 1284(42) 1361.82 <0.0001
    2 598 (19) 1597.05
    3 1211 (39) 1718.63
Pleomorphism
    1 58 (1.8) 1213.87 <0.0001
    2 1084 (35) 1368.07
    3 1949 (36.2) 1654.48
Tubular Formation
    1 205 (6.6) 1282.29 <0.0001
    2 984 (31.7) 1510.29
    3 1906 (61.7) 1596.05
Lympho-vascular Invasion
    Negative 2205 (70) 1549.6 0.004
    Positive 954 (30) 1650.1
Axillary Nodal Stage
    1 1989 (63) 1563.5 0.136
    2 903 (28) 1607.3
    3 277 (9) 1666.6
Nottingham Prognostic Index
    Good 1041 (33) 1416.0 <0.0001
    Moderate 1632 (51) 1659.3
    Poor 496 (16) 1695.0
Oestrogen Receptor
    Negative 704 (22) 1677.0 0.001
    Positive 2453 (78) 1550.9
Progesterone Receptor
    Negative 1256 (41) 1585.5 0.007
    Positive 1813 (59) 1500.0
HER2 Status
    Negative 2677 (87) 1513.8 <0.0001
    Positive 402 (13) 1714.3
Triple Negative
    Negative 2630 (84) 1538.7 0.007
    Positive 483 (16) 1656.5

Significant P values are in bold.