Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2022 Feb 16;19(1):10.1088/1741-2552/ac4f9b. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac4f9b

Table 3.

Summary of the number of contacts showing significant phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) Change compared to ITI period

Stimulus-locked segments
ID Number of contact shows
active theta-LG PAC in
incongruent condition
Number of artifact-free trials/Number of total trials
Congruent Incongruent
1 R 0/2 62/64 60/64
2 R 1/3 62/64 59/64
3 R 1/2 61/64 57/64
4 R 0/3 60/64 61/64
L 0/4 60/64 61/64
5 R 1/2 61/64 57/64
6 R 0/1 59/64 57/64
L 0/2 59/64 57/64
7 L 2/2 24/32 23/32 (TRmin)
8 L 2/4 55/64 47/64
Response-locked segment
ID Number of contact shows
active theta PAC
Number of artifact-free trials/Number of total trials
Congruent Incongruent
1 R 0/2 Same as the numbers in stimulus-locked information
2 R 1/3
3 R 0/3
4 R 0/3
L 0/4
5 R 0/2
6 R 0/1
L 0/2
7 L 0/2
8 L 0/4

Summary of contact in OFC for each patient. The total number of contacts and the number of contacts showing active theta-LG OAC changes are shown. Information on the number of trials that persisted for analysis after artifact removal is also displayed.