Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 22.
Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2021 Dec 6;184(26):6281–6298.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.018

Figure 3: Identification of functionally distinct encephalitogenic Th17 cell subpopulations.

Figure 3:

(A) Schematic of the experimental setup.

(B) UMAP representation of unsupervised clustering of current (GFP+) and ex-Th17 cells (GFP) from the CNS of EAE mice at disease onset.

(C) Cell numbers and relative frequencies of each cluster.

(D) Relative expression of genes uniquely up-regulated in each cluster (Wilcoxon rank-sum test; FDR <0.05, fold change ≥1.5). Data are shown for a random sample of 1,000 cells.

(E) Expression of a selected set of cluster markers. Extreme expression values (<0.5 or >99.5 percentiles) were excluded and points were shown for randomly selected 20% of the cells.

(F) Selected GO terms and KEGG pathways from cluster-specific gene set enrichment analysis. Only positively enriched results were shown.

(G) CD8α expression by flow cytometry on viable TCRβ+ CD4+ tdTomato+ CNS cells (n=8). Quantification (left) and a representative flow cytometry plot (right).

(H) qPCR gene expression analysis of cluster 3 marker genes comparing CD8α to CD8α+ tdTomato+ CNS cells (n=4). RE = Relative expression.

(I) Clonal expansion for each CNS cluster. Size of a pie slice represents the proportion of cells that belong to clones of the color-indicated size computed within each cluster. Number of cells is shown on the top. Clonal expansion scores for clusters (0–4) are 0.04, 0.07, 0.03, 0.03 and 0.13, respectively.

(J) PD-1 expression by flow cytometry on viable TCRβ+ CD4+ tdTomato+ CNS cells (n=8). Quantification (left) and a representative flow cytometry plot (right).

(K) Effector cytokine expression by flow cytometry in PD-1 and PD-1+ tdTomato+ CNS cells (n=8). Paired two-tailed t-tests were performed.

See also Figure S4 and Table S1.