Table 7.
Logistic regression model results, examining predictors of compliancea.
| Characteristics | Model 1: all EMAsb | Model 2: time-triggered EMAs | Model 3: eating event–triggered EMAs | |||
|
|
β (SE) | ORc (95% CI) | β (SE) | OR (95% CI) | β (SE) | OR (95% CI) |
| Intercept | 2.17d,e (0.27) | 8.75 (5.20-14.82) | 2.22e (0.29) | 9.22 (5.24-16.36) | 2.41f (0.74) | 11.15 (2.65-48.64) |
| Age (years) | .00 (0.01) | 1.00 (0.98-1.03) | .00 (0.01) | 1.00 (0.98-1.02) | .02 (0.03) | 1.02 (0.96-1.08) |
| Afternoon | −.47f (0.16) | 0.63 (0.46-0.86) | −.51f (0.18) | 0.60 (0.42-0.85) | −.35 (0.38) | 0.71 (0.33-1.46) |
| Evening | −.50f (0.15) | 0.61 (0.45-0.81) | −.63e (0.17) | 0.53 (0.38-0.74) | .28 (0.38) | 1.32 (0.62-2.75) |
| Weekend, yes | .06 (0.11) | 1.06 (0.86-1.31) | −.06 (0.12) | 0.95 (0.75-1.19) | .87g (0.35) | 2.40 (1.25-4.91) |
| Deployment day | −.02 (0.01) | 0.98 (0.96-1.01) | −.01 (0.01) | 0.99 (0.97-1.01) | −.09f (0.03) | 0.92 (0.86-0.97) |
| Female, yes | .19 (0.15) | 1.21 (0.90-1.65) | .31 (0.17) | 1.37 (0.98-1.92) | −.65 (0.43) | 0.52 (0.22-1.22) |
| Mother | −.01 (0.34) | 0.99 (0.51-1.93) | .06 (0.36) | 1.06 (0.53-2.16) | −.65 (1.07) | 0.52 (0.06-4.56) |
| Father | −.42 (0.35) | 0.66 (0.33-1.30) | −.37 (0.38) | 0.69 (0.33-1.47) | −.64 (0.93) | 0.53 (0.08-3.26) |
| Others answered, yes | .65e (0.10) | 1.91 (1.56-2.34) | .73e (0.11) | 2.07 (1.66-2.58) | −.02 (0.30) | 0.99 (0.54-1.76) |
aAkaike information criteria is 2805.16, 2417.32, and 375.57 for models 1-3, respectively. Bayesian information criteria is 2868.52, 2479.50, and 416.91 for models 1-3, respectively.
bEMA: ecological momentary assessment.
cOR: odds ratio.
dValues indicate significant estimates.
eP<.001.
fP<.01.
gP<.05.