Table 4.
Question | Progress |
---|---|
How do we interpret eosinophil number in tissues that have eosinophils during homeostasis? How can we improve diagnosis for non-EoE EGID? | Consensus criteria are being established in a consensus process led by CEGIR. |
Is the number of eosinophils a relevant parameter or, for instance, may localization of the eosinophilia or other histologic or molecular findings be more informative for disease assessment and outcomes and/or therapeutic endpoint assessment? | Histology Scoring Systems (HSS) that take into account a number of parameters in addition to eosinophils are being developed. Likewise, endoscopic scoring systems have been (e.g., EoG-EREFS) and are being developed. Molecular and cellular dissection of disease pathogenesis is developing a framework for disease biomarkers. Furthermore, patient-reported outcome (PRO) metrics are being developed and have been used in EoG/EoD clinical trials; their coimplementation with clinical care is a focus area. |
Why do non-EoE EGID have lower prevalence than EoE? Are they underdiagnosed? | Prevalence studies are ongoing and have suggested that a combination of factors, including increased disease recognition and the allergy epidemic, are contributing to increased diagnosis of non-EoE EGID. |
How do non-EoE EGIDs, IBS, DBGI (formerly FGID) relate? What does this mean for our understanding of non-EoE EGID? | A detailed analysis of eosinophil levels and type 2 immunity is currently underway; disease overlap may be present in some patients. |
Why are some tissues affected and not others? | This is a cardinal question, and detailed studies of EoE suggest that tissue-specific, genetically defined pathways and susceptibility are involved. |
Are there differences between resident and infiltrating eosinophils and their role in disease initiation, perpetuation, resolution, and/or recurrence? | Fundamental studies about eosinophil heterogeneity are revealing multiple populations of eosinophils, some with potential helpful properties (e.g., regulatory eosinophils). The role of eosinophil heterogeneity in EGID is an outstanding question. |
Do the affected areas represent distinct diseases in a continuum or a spectrum? | Evidence is emerging that distinct tissue involvement in non-EoE EGID may represent a disease continuum, but this is a debated topic. |
How do we separate functional dyspepsia, DBGI (e.g., IBS), and EGID? | In most clinical cases, a thorough histologic and pathologic evaluation will lead to the diagnosis of EGID. Moreover, clinicians with familiarity with non-EoE EGID clinical manifestation and appropriate medical workup are able to recognize and differentiate these diseases for clinical and research purposes. Detailed cellular, molecular, and neuro-immunologic characterization of these diseases will likely facilitate future diagnosis and patient phenotyping and endotyping. |
What is the EoC disease course and does it differ from gastric and enteric EGID disease courses? What underlies EoC’s lower association with atopy relative to other non-EoE EGID? | Preliminary studies suggest a distinct etiology and disease course for EoC; more studies are needed. |
What are appropriate endpoints to assess a treatment’s clinical benefit for each non-EoE EGID? | A series of broad outcome metrics spanning histologic, endoscopic, molecular, and clinical features are being developed. This is a focus area of CEGIR. |
How can the development of approaches and assessments for “clinical benefit” for clinical trials and “meaningful benefit” for clinical practice be complementary? | Increasing dialogue between key stakeholders, including patients, researchers, and FDA and industry representatives, will be key in this regard. |
What are appropriate endpoints to assess a treatment’s clinical benefit for each non-EoE EGID? How can non-invasive and QOL assessments be developed and/or validated for meaningful benefit for clinical practice? | A series of validated endpoints involving clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and molecular features are being developed and will likely prove to be valuable. |