Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 17;35(1):163–186. doi: 10.1007/s10334-021-00985-2

Table 3.

Perfusion results

Study Modality/MRI field Number/female (age ± SD y) Tumor Type/WHO grade Treatment Imaging Main finding
Bian [39] 3T 18/8F (44 ± 12) HGG III–IV IMRTx 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2 DSC CBV↓ after 1y in corpus callosum vs T0
Fahlström [43] 1.5T 10/?F (59 ± 8) HGG III–IV IMRTx 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2 DSC CBV↓4.6–6.7%, CBF↓ 5.1–12.5% in GM at 1 m vs < 5 Gy,T0
Fuss [37] 1.5T 25/7F (41 ± ?) LGG II RTx 60 Gy, DXM 1.5-8 mg/day DSC CBV↓ 30% for > 24 Gy after 1.5-24 m vs T0
Jakubovic [40] 1.5T 19/9F (? ± ?) Metastasis SRS 16-24 Gy DSC CBV↑ 43%, CBF↑ 34% after 1 m in 5-10 Gy vs T0
Lee [41] 1.5T 22/9F (49 ± ?) HGG III–IV RTx 60 Gy DSC CBV↓ non-significant vs T0
Nilsen [44] 3T 40/24F (63 ± ?) Metastasis SRS 15-21 Gy DSC CBF, CBV↓ 5%, vessel caliber↑ 5% after 6–9 m vs T0
Price [38] 3T 3/1F (? ± ?) LGG II RTx 54 Gy DSC CBV↓ 16–21%, CBF↓ in WM > 33 Gy vs T0
Singh [45] 3T 25/11F (55 ± ?) recGBM IV BEV escalating 2–15 mg/kg DSC  ↔ CBF, CBV in WM after 6-12 m vs T0
Stadlbauer [46] 3T 18/8F (54 ± 11) recGBM IV BEV 10 mg/kg DSC CBV↓ 20–30% after 3 m, 7 m vs T0 and vs no-BEV
18/6F (53 ± 15) No BEV
Weber [42] 1.5T 25/11F (57 ± ?) Metastasis SRS 16-20 Gy DSC  ↔ CBF in WM/GM after 1.5-6 m vs T0
Wenz [36] 1.5T 19/3F (40 ± 12) LGG II CRTx 60 Gy DSC CBV↓ 30% in WM and GM after 6 m vs T0
13/3F (56 ± 9) Metastasis WBRTx 30-40 Gy
Andre [54] 1.5/3T 18/8F (57 ± ?) recGBM IV RTx 60 Gy, TMZ, BEV 7.5-10 mg/kg pCASL Acute CBF↓ 13% in MCA region vs T0
Chen [55] 3T 31/31F (47 ± 5) Breast II–III DXR 60, CP 600, DTX 100 mg/m pCASL CBF↑ 7–12% after 1 m vs T0 and HC
34/34F (46 ± 4) HC No
Li [53] 3T 21/4F (14 ± ?) MB IV RTx 55 Gy, CPT, CP pCASL CBF↓ up to 23% after 0.3-15y vs HC and PA group
18/9F (12 ± ?) PA I No
64/41F (12 ± ?) HC No
Nudelman [56] 3T 27/27F (50 ± 8) Breast I–III RTx 2, DXR 11, CP,DTX, HTx 3 PASL CBF↑ 7–12% after 1 m vs CTx- and HC group; CBF↑ 35% in CTx + , CBF↑ 13% in CTx- both in precentral gyrus vs HC
26/26F (52 ± 9) Breast 0–II RTx 6, HTx
26/26F (48 ± 10) HC No
Nudelman [57] 3T 24/24F (49 ± 8) Breast I–III RTx 2, DXR 11, CP, DTX, HTx PASL CBF↑ after 1 m and 12 m in CTx + vs T0
23/23F (59 ± 9) Breast 0–II HTx
Petr [140] 3T 24/? (54 ± 14) GBM IV IMRTx 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2 pCASL CBF↓ 9.8% in GM after 3 and 6 m vs T0
Petr [9] 3T 44/20F (55 ± 13) GBM IV RTx 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2 pCASL CBF↓ 10–11% in GM after 3 and 6 m, proton and photon therapy comparable ↓ vs T0
16/5F (52 ± 16) Proton 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2
Wang [52] 3T 16/? (65 ± 9) LGG I–II RTx 36-63 Gy pCASL CBF↓ 7–18% after 2-4 m vs T0
19/? (62 ± 9) HGG III–IV CBF↑ 0–18% after 2-4 m vs T0
Weber [42] 1.5T 25/11F (25–73) Metastases SRS 16-20 Gy PASL  ↔ CBF WM/GM until 6 m vs T0
Artzi [50] 3T 26/16 (51 ± 12) HGG III–IV RTx, BEV DCE  ↔ Vp in WM or GM vs T0
11/? (37 ± 11) HC No
Cao [47] 1.5T 10/1F (45 ± 16) CNS I–III 3D-CRTx 50-60 Gy DCE Vp↑ 12% after 1 m, Ktrans↑ 52% at w6 of therapy vs T0
Fahlström [48] 1.5T 12/?F (56 ± 11) HGG III–IV IMRTx 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2, BEV DCE Ve↑ 8% after 3 m vs T0
Farjam [49] 1.5T 27/10F (50 ± 12) CNS I–III IMRT/3DCRTx 50-60 Gy DCE Ktrans ↑ in hippocampus after 1 m vs T0
Wong [51] 3T 14/9F (?) Metastases WBRTx 37.5 Gy DCE  ↔ after 1–5 months vs T0
Gulaldi [33] SPECT 18/5F (42 ± 13) Glioma II–IV RTx 54-64 Gy, CTx Tc-99 m-HMPAO CBF↓ 18.5% in < 3 Gy, 22.5% in > 3 Gy after 3-6 m vs T0
Hahn [34] PET 11/5F (48 ± ?) CNS I–III 3DCRTx 50-60 Gy 15O-H2O CBF↑ 0.6–5.1% in > 10 Gy at 3w vs < 5 Gy, T0; resolved after 6 m vs T0
Taki [32] SPECT 13/8F (52 ± ?) CNS, AVM, metastases SRS 14-25 Gy Tc-99 m-HMPAO CBF↓ 4, 7% whole brain after 2w and 3 m in 2-5 Gy vs T0
Vera [35] SPECT 12/5F (11 ± ?) AML, AAL WBRTx 12-18 Gy, HD ara-C 18–36 g/m2 Tc-99 m-HMPAO Heterogeneous CBF in cortex, cerebellum after 1 m vs T0

Tumor type: AAL acute lymphoid leukemia, AML acute myeloid leukemia, AVM arteriovenous malformation, CNS central nervous system, GBM glioblastoma, HC healthy control, HGG high-grade glioma, LGG low-grade glioma, MB medulloblastoma, PA pilocytic astrocytoma, recGBM recurrent GBM, WHO World Health Organization

Treatment type: BEV bevacizumab, CTx chemotherapy, CPT cisplatin, CRTx conformal RTx, CP cyclophosphamide, DXM dexamethasone, DTX docetaxel, DXR doxorubicin, HTx hormone therapy, IMRTx intensity-modulated RTx, RTx radiotherapy, SRS stereotactic radiosurgery, TMZ temozolomide, WBRTx whole-brain RTx

Imaging: ASL arterial spin labeling, DSC dynamic susceptibility contrast, DCE dynamic contrast enhanced, pCASL pseudo-continuous ASL, PASL pulsed ASL

Findings: CBF cerebral blood flow, CBV cerebral blood volume, Ktrans exchange rate between Ve and Vp, Ve extravascular, extracellular fractional volume, GM gray matter, Vp intravascular blood plasma fractional volume, MCA middle cerebral artery, T0 pre-therapy baseline, WM white matter