Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 10;15(1):5–13. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab131

Table 2.

Published studies with DPP-4i use in KT

Study id Study design, follow-up Population Intervention/s Outcome
Lane et al. [36]
  • Case series, n = 15

  • Follow-up: 3 months

KT recipients with eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and diagnosis of PTDM All patients treated with sitagliptin
  • Reduction in HbA1c from 7.2 ± 0.1% to 6.7 ± 0.2% (P = 0.002)

  • No patient discontinuation because of side effects

  • No symptomatic hypoglycaemia

Sanyal et al. [37]
  • Case series, n = 21

  • Follow-up: 6 months

  • KT recipients with diagnosis of PTDM and stable renal function

  • *Immunosuppression: prednisone 5 mg/day and standard dose of tacrolimus

All patients received linagliptin monotherapy (5 mg/day)
  • Decrease in FPG of 22.21 mg/dL and decrease in postprandial plasma glucose of 40.07 mg/dL (P < 0.01)

  • Decrease of HbA1c 0.6% in 24 weeks

Soliman et al. [38]
  • RCT, n = 62

  • Follow-up: 3 months

KT recipients with PTDM receiving metformin and inadequate glycaemic control
  • Metformin + sitagliptin versus metformin + insulin

  • * Rescue therapy: pioglitazone

  • Similar reduction in HbA1c in both groups (−0.6 ± 0.5% with sitagliptin and −0.6 ± 0.6% in insulin group)

  • Small weight loss in sitagliptin group (−0.4 kg) and weight gain in insulin group (+0.8 kg); P < 0.05

  • No severe adverse events

Boerner et al. [39]
  • Case series, n = 22

  • Mean follow-up: 32.5 ± 17.8 months

KT recipients with diagnosis of PTDM treated with sitagliptin alone All patients treated with sitagliptin monotherapy
  • Mean HbA1c 6.5 ± 0.5%.

  • No episodes of pancreatitis

  • Rare transplant-specific adverse events

Haidinger et al. [40]
  • Phase II RCT, n = 33

  • Follow-up: 4 months

KT recipients (>6 months post-KT) with stable renal function and diagnosis of PTDM Vildagliptin 50 mg/day versus placebo during 3 months
  • Reduced HbA1c (6.1% versus 6.5%, P < 0.05) and 2HPG (182.7 versus 231.2 mg/dL, P < 0.05) in the vildagliptin group versus placebo

  • Mild adverse events, similar rates in both groups

Strøm Halden et al. [41]
  • RCT cross-over, n = 19

  • Follow-up: 8 weeks

KT recipients (>1a) with PTDM and stable renal function
  • 4 weeks with sitagliptin followed by 4 weeks with no sitagliptin, versus vice versa

  • * Also includes patients with other oral antidiabetic treatment, maintained with same dose

  • Significant increase of insulin secretion with sitagliptin

  • Decrease in FPG [0.9 (0.5–1.7) mmol/L; P = 0.003] and 2HPG [2.9 (0.5–6.4) mmol/L; P = 0.004]

Guardado-Mendoza et al. [42]
  • Prospective cohort study, n = 28

  • Follow-up: 12 months

KT recipients with fasting hyperglicaemia during the first 24 h post-surgery Linagliptin 5 mg/days plus insulin versus insulin alone
  • Lower glucose levels (131.0 ± 15.1 versus 191.1 ± 22.5 mg/dL) and insulin doses (37.5 ± 6.3 versus 24.2 ± 6.6 U) in the linagliptin + insulin group (P < 0.05)

  • Less severe hypoglicaemia in linagliptin + insulin group (65.1 ± 2.2 versus 54.2 ± 3.3 mg/dL; P = 0.036)

FPG, fasting plasma glucose.