Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;35(4):596–604. doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0333

Table 11.

Effect of the fermented feed on proportion of bacteria at genus level in broilers (%)

Items Treatments1) SEM p-value

BF 10% DFF 15% DFF 20% DFF 25% DFF 10% WFF
Unclassified 38.15 37.68 48.45 35.97 47.17 40.11 2.09 0.396
Alistipes 24.64 21.76 9.03 14.69 12.52 17.18 1.75 0.090
Ruminococcus 3.86b 6.24ab 2.59b 3.79b 3.71b 8.58a 0.53 0.008
Lactobacillus 3.65 1.84 9.88 6.02 2.19 2.37 0.94 0.092
Faecalibacterium 4.44 4.19 2.91 7.77 2.83 3.40 0.78 0.471
Bacteroides 2.04 4.34 1.39 2.35 6.20 2.99 0.51 0.063
Subdoligranulum 3.07 1.06 5.43 1.97 1.27 3.84 0.57 0.202
Romboutsia 1.69 2.62 3.04 3.08 1.72 0.62 0.58 0.820
Barnesiella 1.97 1.42 1.87 1.56 1.73 3.27 0.40 0.824
Clostridium XlVa 1.17 1.54 1.22 2.14 2.72 2.14 0.24 0.401
Clostridium IV 1.47 1.82 1.42 1.11 2.03 1.24 0.11 0.105
Bilophila 0.59 0.52 2.51 4.14 0.40 0.70 0.60 0.378
Butyricicoccus 1.55 0.87 0.89 0.85 1.69 1.98 0.20 0.438
Vampirovibrio 1.02 1.89 1.90 0.66 0.93 0.46 0.29 0.596
Dorea 0.99 1.68 0.54 1.02 0.94 1.16 0.17 0.577

SEM, standard error of the mean.

1)

BF, basal diet; DFF, dried fermented feed; WFF, wet fermented feed.

a,b

Values within a row with no or the same letter superscripts mean no significant difference (p>0.05); values with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p<0.05).