Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;13:786292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786292

Table 4.

Results of the structural model.

Hypothesized paths β C.R. Sig. Decision
H1: Altruistic value → GPA −0.165 −2.670 0.008 Not supported
H2: Altruistic value → SN 0.520 7.612 ***c Supported
H3: Altruistic value → PBC 0.449 5.913 ***c Supported
H4: Biospheric value → GPA 0.310 8.177 ***c Supported
H5: Biospheric value → SN 0.010 0.221 0.825 Not supported
H6: Biospheric value → PBC 0.132 2.630 0.009 Supported
H7: Collectivistic value → GPA 0.035 0.653 0.513 Not supported
H8: Collectivistic value → SN −0.007 −0.109 0.913 Not supported
H9: Collectivistic value → PBC 0.063 0.869 0.385 Not supported
H10: Function value → GPA 0.210 3.642 ***c Supported
H11: Emotional value → GPA 0.480 10.743 ***c Supported
H12: Function value/emotional value/GPA 0.019a
0.000b
Supported
H13: Social value → GPA 0.055 1.669 0.095 Not supported
H14: Social value/emotional value/GPA 0.059a
0.715b
Not supported
H15: Green purchase attitude → GPI 0.577 14.639 ***c Supported
H16: Subjective norm → GPI 0.152 2.760 0.006 Supported
H17: Subjective norm/GPA/GPI 0.108a
0.001b
Supported
H18: Perceived behavioral control → GPI 0.278 4.474 ***c Supported
a

Denotes standardized direct effect with bootstrapping method (two-tailed significance).

b

Denotes standardized indirect effect with bootstrapping method (two-tailed significance).

c

Denotes p < 0.001.