Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;9:811433. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.811433

Table 3.

Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) over 24 ha.

FMD (%) Time-point
Test meals 0 h 1 h 2 h 4 h 5.5 h 7 h 24 h
Control 6.5 ± 0.7 7.1 ± 0.8 7.2 ± 0.9 7.3 ± 1.0 6.8 ± 0.7 6.5 ± 1.0 6.5 ± 0.8
Italian herb 6.5 ± 0.7 6.4 ± 0.7 6.0 ± 0.6 8.2 ± 0.9 8.0 ± 0.7 7.5 ± 0.6 8.1 ± 0.7*
Cinnamon 6.5 ± 0.8 5.1 ± 0.5 7.4 ± 0.6 7.3 ± 1.1 6.5 ± 0.9 7.8 ± 0.8 8.1 ± 0.9#
Pumpkin pie 7.4 ± 0.6 6.2 ± 0.7 6.0 ± 0.7 7.3 ± 0.7 7.0 ± 0.7 6.4 ± 0.6 7.9 ± 0.6*
a

Main effect of meal (P = 0.26), time (P = 0.17), age (P = 0.02), and significant meal by time interaction (P = 0.04). Data are means ± standard error of mean, n = 25. %FMD, percentage change in flow-mediated dilation. Data were log-transformed prior to statistical analysis. PROC MIXED (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) was used for repeated measures. Dunnett-Hsu adjustment was used in the model. Significantly different from control,

*

P < 0.05,

#

P = 0.06.