Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;22:156. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03218-9

Table 2.

Analysis of the examiners’ responses about the organization, quality, and evaluation of e-OSCE

Questionnaire statements Surgery
(N = 17)
Medicine
(N = 16)
Family Medicine
(N = 18)
Total (%)
(N = 51)
1. Overall, the tested level of knowledge and skills
 Too difficult/difficult 0 1 0 1 (2)
 Fair 14 13 16 43 (84.3)
 Too easy/easy 3 2 2 7 (13.7)
2. e-OSCE was closer to real life practice
 Strongly disagree/disagree 1 1 1 3 (5.9)
 Neutral 4 4 2 10 (19.6)
 Strongly agree/agree 12 11 15 38 (74.5)
3. e-OSCE was well-organized
 Strongly disagree/Disagree 0 0 0 0
 Neutral 0 1 0 1 (2)
 Strongly agree/agree 17 15 18 50 (98)
4. e-OSCE was conducted smoothly
 Strongly disagree/disagree 0 0 0 0
 Neutral 0 1 0 1 (2)
 Strongly agree/agree 17 15 18 50 (98)
5. I am interested to be called as an examiner in future for similar OSCEs
 Strongly disagree/disagree 0 0 0 0
 Neutral 1 2 0 3 (5.9)
 Strongly agree/agree 16 14 18 48 (94.1)
6. Preferring e-OSCE over the traditional face to face OSCE
 Strongly disagree/disagree 7 4 5 16 (31.4)
 Neutral 8 7 0 15 (29.4)
 Strongly agree/agree 2 5 13 20 (39.2)