Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 5;45:101328. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101328

Figure 1.

Figure1

Diagnostic performance of published clinical prediction rules versus the RISK11 transcriptomic signature

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing diagnostic performance (area under the curve, AUC, with 95% CI) for prevalent TB diagnosed on one or more liquid culture-positive or Xpert MTB/RIF-positive sputum samples of (a) the RISK11 transcriptomic signature versus the Hanifa2017 and Baik2020 clinical prediction scores, and (b) the RISK11 transcriptomic signature versus the Periskope-TB tool (intended for prognosis in low TB incidence settings) and interferon-γ release assay (IGRA). The shaded areas represent the 95% CIs. The solid box depicts the optimal criteria (95% sensitivity and 80% specificity) and the dashed box depicts the minimal criteria (90% sensitivity and 70% specificity) set out in the WHO Target Product Profile for a TB triage test.28