Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;20(3):e07128. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7128

Table 11.

Results of the comparison of the L. monocytogenes HPP inactivation (log10 reduction) outputs provided by predictive model developed by Hereu et al. (2012b) and the observations collected from experiments available in the scientific literature for different RTE food categories

RTE food category n( a ) Fail dangerous( b )

ASZ

(± 1 log)( c )

Fail

safe( d )

ASZ and fail safe (conservative)
Pressure range 200–727 MPa and holding time up to 30 min
Cooked meat products 805 11% 68% 21% 89%
Soft cheese 141 35% 36% 28% 65%
Smoked fish 28 32% 57% 11% 68%
Total 974 15% 63% 22% 85%
Pressure range 400–600 MPa and holding time up to 15 min
Cooked meat products 304 19% 67% 14% 81%
Soft cheese 88 42% 30% 28% 58%
Smoked fish 13 54% 46% 8% 54%
Total 405 25% 58% 17% 75%

RTE = ready‐to‐eat.

(a)

Number of observations (log10 reduction data) retrieved from literature compared with the log10 reduction provided by the model.

(b)

log10 reduction provided by the model (simulation) being at least 1 log10 higher than the observed value.

(c)

ASZ = Acceptable Simulation Zone; log10 reduction provided by the model (simulation) being less than 1 log10 unit higher or lower than the observed value.

(d)

log10 reduction provided by the model (simulation) being at least 1 log10 lower than the observed value.