Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Med Inform. 2022 Feb 5;160:104713. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104713

Table 1:

Demographics of study participants

Characteristics N=158
Age, mean (SD) 49.7 (10.3)
Gender, N (%) Male 79 (50.0)
Female 72 (45.6)
Othera 7 (4.4)
Race, N (%) African American/Black 112 (70.9)
White 11 (7.0)
Unknown 22 (13.9)
Other 13 (8.2)
Ethnicity, N (%) Non-Hispanic 113 (71.5)
Hispanic 45 (28.5)
Education, N (%) Below high school 40 (25.3)
High school 47 (29.8)
Above high school 71 (44.9)
Annual income, N (%) <$10,000 85 (53.8)
$10,000–$19,999 38 (24.1)
≥$20,000 16 (10.1)
Don’t know 19 (12.0)
Relationship status, N (%) In a relationship 46 (29.1)
Not in a relationship 110 (69.6)
Unknown 2 (1.3)
Sexuality, N (%) Homosexual 37 (23.4)
Heterosexual 92 (58.2)
Bisexual 20 (12.7)
Other 2 (1.3)
Unknown 7 (4.4)
Children, N (%) Yes 87 (55.1)
No 71 (44.9)
Confidence in completion medical forms independently, N (%) Extremely 89 (56.3)
Quite a bit 35 (22.2)
Somewhat 28 (17.7)
A little bit 4 (2.5)
Not at all 2 (1.3)
Newest Vital Sign, mean (SD; range)b 1.4 (1.4; 0–6.0)
Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, mean (SD)c 30.5 (6.8; 2.036.0)
a

Included transgender male, transgender female, genderqueer, and unknown

b

Consists of 6 questions and the total score ranges from 0–6; a higher score indicates greater health literacy; 6 participants had missing data

c

Consists of 36 questions and the total score ranges 0–36; a higher score indicates greater functional health literacy