Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 28;57(4):212–221. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000835

TABLE 3.

Comparison of Stent Diameters and Blooming Artifacts Between EID-DLCT and SPCCT With Different Kernels

EID-DLCT SPCCT XCD vs Sharp Detailed 2 vs Sharp
XCD Detailed 2 Sharp P P
Proximal diameter
 Internal, mm Obs 1 1.30 (1.15) 1.90 (1.05) 2.00 (0.95) 0.002 0.04
Obs 2 1.55 (2.35) 2.30 (0.95) 2.3 (1.00) 0.007 0.76
 External, mm Obs 1 5.0 (1.10) 4.50 (1.25) 4.40 (1.35) 0.011 1.00
Obs 2 4.45 (1.03) 4.10 (0.85) 4.10 (0.95) 0.010 0.71
Distal diameter
 Internal, mm Obs 1 1.45 (1.30) 2.00 (0.70) 1.90 (0.90) 0.005 0.23
Obs 2 1.85 (2.35) 2.10 (1.10) 2.20 (1.10) 0.007 0.48
 External, mm Obs 1 4.30 (1.00) 4.10 (1.60) 3.90 (1.20) 0.007 0.07
Obs 2 4.30 (1.33) 3.80 (1.30) 3.80 (1.60) 0.007 0.25
Blooming, %
Obs 1 71.26 (27.23) 57.41 (13.49) 53.38 (11.90) 0.002 0.012
Obs 2 62.96 (43.90) 41.49 (11.33) 39.36 (11.69) 0.003 0.42

Continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range). Data in bold indicate significant values.

EID-DLCT indicates energy integrating detectors dual-layer computed tomography; SPCCT, spectral photon counting computed tomography; XCD, Xres cardiac detailed.