Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;12:4132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07954-2

Table 3.

Performance comparison of the proposed network with state-of-the-art classification models. Bold indicates the best performance while the second-best performance (across each metric) is underlined.

Model Input size Sensitivity Specificity Precision F1
ResNet-10172 224 × 224 × 3 0.9583 0.9333 0.9718 0.9650
DenseNet-20145 224 × 224 × 3 0.9444 0.9000 0.9577 0.9510
EfficientNetB446 224 × 224 × 3 0.9583 0.9666 0.9857 0.9718
MobileNetv247 224 × 224 × 3 0.9306 0.9000 0.9571 0.9437
Proposed 224 × 224 × 3 0.9722 0.9666 0.9859 0.9790