Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;75(1):e1137–e1144. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1053

Table 4.

Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Positivity (Past 3 Months) Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men Overall and By Race Before and During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic, Understanding Sexual Health in Networks Study, Baltimore City, Maryland December 2019–December 2020

Chlamydiaa Gonorrheaa
N n % aPRb 95% CI n % aPRb 95% CI
Overall
Pre-pandemic 174 12 6.9 Ref 27 15.5 Ref
Pandemic-2 130 12 9.2 1.62 (.75–3.46) 22 16.9 0.87 (.46–1.62)
Pandemic-3 86 7 8.1 1.13 (.24–1.27) 6 7.0 0.56 (.24–1.27)
Black MSM
Pre-pandemic 125 10 8.0 Ref 24 19.2 Ref
Pandemic-2 87 10 11.5 1.83 (.81–4.13) 18 20.7 0.88 (.45–1.72)
Pandemic-3 66 6 9.1 1.11 (.45–2.73) 5 7.6 0.53 (.21–1.35)
Non-Black MSM
Pre-pandemic 49 2 4.1 3 6.1
Pandemic-2 43 2 4.7 4 9.3
Pandemic-3 20 1 5.0 1 5.0

Pandemic-1: April 2020–June 2020; pandemic-2: July 2020–September 2020; pandemic-3: October 2020–December 2020.

Abbreviations: aPR, adjusted prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval; MSM, men who have sex with men.

Among those tested via a nucleic acid amplification test at any anatomic site. Biologic testing was unavailable during the first 3 study visits that occurred during the pandemic (April 2020–June 2020).

Prevalence ratios calculated using generalized estimating equations and Poisson regression with robust standard errors to account for repeated measures among individuals and adjusting for reported value during the pre-pandemic study visit. Regression models for chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity among non-Black MSM are not shown due to small sample sizes. Bolded values are significant using < .05.